Tadek wrote:Hi everybody,
first of all I would like to say that I am really impressed by what you people are doing here. Very nice work! And thanks a lot for sharing all this with everybody out there.
The Trionic tools make me want to buy another Saab!
I would like to ask a few questions.
So far, it is possible to identify quite a few maps and modify them. As I understood, there is no injector constant or anything similar within the Motronic code. If I wanted to use different injectors or a different AMM size, I would have to rescale the whole map(s). Is that right? What about the load axis in this case? Can this stay the same? One thing I do not quite understand is that the load axis is supposed to be based in injector energizing time or something similar. Therefore it should have to be scaled when changing to different flow injectors.
If there is no injector constant, the load scaling should be different for 850T5R and 850R, as those cars have different flow rate injectors. Or am I missing something? The maps seem similar for T5R and 850R maps (VE map), so the scaling factor must be included somewere, already.
What do I have to do for example to use the RICA 850 T5R map in an 850 R?
What about the rev limit? Has anyone found out where this might be, as this is usually raised within modified files.
And what do I have to do in order not to hit the fuel cut when I increase the air mass flow by increased boost levels?
Best regards,
Tadek
Hi!
Does the 850R use a different MAF sensor than the T5/T5r? If so, could it be that the injector constant is fixed in the MAF sensor that is programmed for certain injector flow.
I know that the older FORD EEC-IV ECU cars had different MAF sensors for different injector sizes. It' meant, if you wanted bigger injectors on your car (1.6 ZETEC), you could swap bigger injectors and MAF from another EEC-IV car (2.0 ZETEC) and the engine would run normal and not overfuel.
Jan